Go Back   WebMasters.org Forums > Search Engine Forums > Yahoo Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2010, 08:42 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Default yahoo vs msn vs google

Yahoo!

* been in the search game for many years.
* is better than MSN but nowhere near as good as Google at determining if a link is a natural citation or not.
* has a ton of internal content and a paid inclusion program. both of which give them incentive to bias search results toward commercial results
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in Yahoo!

MSN Search

* new to the search game
* is bad at determining if a link is natural or artificial in nature
* due to sucking at link analysis they place too much weight on the page content
* their poor relevancy algorithms cause a heavy bias toward commercial results
* likes bursty recent links
* new sites that are generally untrusted in other systems can rank quickly in MSN Search
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in MSN Search

Google

* has been in the search game a long time, and saw the web graph when it is much cleaner than the current web graph
* is much better than the other engines at determining if a link is a true editorial citation or an artificial link
* looks for natural link growth over time
* heavily biases search results toward informational resources
* trusts old sites way too much
* a page on a site or subdomain of a site with significant age or link related trust can rank much better than it should, even with no external citations
* they have aggressive duplicate content filters that filter out many pages with similar content
* if a page is obviously focused on a term they may filter the document out for that term. on page variation and link anchor text variation are important. a page with a single reference or a few references of a modifier will frequently outrank pages that are heavily focused on a search phrase containing that modifier
* crawl depth determined not only by link quantity, but also link quality. Excessive low quality links may make your site less likely to be crawled deep or even included in the index.
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links are generally ineffective in Google when you consider the associated opportunity cost
__________________
miami wedding photographer
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-13-2010, 01:46 AM
Senior Member gay
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 356
Default

Wow! I’ve never heard of this before and I think they’re awesome!
__________________
I have been looking for mbt shoes, I often use the bad results will often buy a new.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2010, 04:59 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dushmantha View Post
Yahoo!

* been in the search game for many years.
* is better than MSN but nowhere near as good as Google at determining if a link is a natural citation or not.
* has a ton of internal content and a paid inclusion program. both of which give them incentive to bias search results toward commercial results
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in Yahoo!

MSN Search

* new to the search game
* is bad at determining if a link is natural or artificial in nature
* due to sucking at link analysis they place too much weight on the page content
* their poor relevancy algorithms cause a heavy bias toward commercial results
* likes bursty recent links
* new sites that are generally untrusted in other systems can rank quickly in MSN Search
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links still work great in MSN Search

Google

* has been in the search game a long time, and saw the web graph when it is much cleaner than the current web graph
* is much better than the other engines at determining if a link is a true editorial citation or an artificial link
* looks for natural link growth over time
* heavily biases search results toward informational resources
* trusts old sites way too much
* a page on a site or subdomain of a site with significant age or link related trust can rank much better than it should, even with no external citations
* they have aggressive duplicate content filters that filter out many pages with similar content
* if a page is obviously focused on a term they may filter the document out for that term. on page variation and link anchor text variation are important. a page with a single reference or a few references of a modifier will frequently outrank pages that are heavily focused on a search phrase containing that modifier
* crawl depth determined not only by link quantity, but also link quality. Excessive low quality links may make your site less likely to be crawled deep or even included in the index.
* things like cheesy off topic reciprocal links are generally ineffective in Google when you consider the associated opportunity cost
Your post have not give me chance to speak because your post have explained all three search engines that I have no more words , Keep it up man. .
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2010, 04:41 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Default

Eeven after having so many features Yahoo and MSN lacks far behind in the competiiton and Google stays on the top, of the search engines list. It is the most and reliable serach engien and also its far more reputed and pupular amonst the general users as well as experts, it has the most number of users i believe.
__________________
replica furniture

Last edited by anselduminy; 05-28-2010 at 05:22 AM..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2010, 01:56 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Nice analysis Dushmantha! I agree that Google is the best and Yahoo can't access its status...
__________________
limewire free download
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2010, 01:38 AM
Senior Member gay
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 356
Default

I was the first time, to see what everyone says
__________________
I have been looking for mbt shoes, I often use the bad results will often buy a new.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2010, 12:18 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Google is the best
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2010, 01:48 AM
Senior Member gay
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 356
Default

I was the first time, to see what everyone says, would like to share with everyone
__________________
I have been looking for mbt shoes, I often use the bad results will often buy a new.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2010, 04:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 20
Default

I am using Google for now. It is not because it's the best search engine in the world but I got no alternative as a webmaster. Everything in IM is based around it.
But it does not mean that it is the best one around specially with the arrival of "Bing". Seems to be a real good competitor for Google.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2010, 04:32 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 17
Default

I would say the best search engine is yahoo with google coming in second. That is my opinion. I have always liked yahoo. MSN is good too. Now if we could only find a search engine that will pay us for each search, we could be in business. Hmm.. I am giong to do a search for that to see if I can find one. I doubt there is one out there, but I might as well look. I know Redgage is a social networking site that pays you to post links, content and more.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=